HotAir’s highlighting this piece from z’Atlantic:
In March, a Swiss woman was gang-raped while she was camped out in a forest with her husband after a day of biking around the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh. And on Monday, an American tourist was raped by three men over the course of six hours while aboard a public van near the seaside resort town of Copacabana .
The incidents have already taken their public-relations toll. The Brazil rape is the latest evidence that the country has a growing sexual assault problem — reports of rapes there have risen 150 percent since 2009 — and raises questions about Brazil’s readiness for the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games.
And in a new survey of 1,200 tour operations across India, the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India found that the number of inbound tourists to the country has dropped 25 percent since December, while the influx of female travelers is down 35 percent.
via The Most Dangerous Countries for Tourists, in Maps – Olga Khazan – The Atlantic.
Honduras has supposedly the highest murder rate per capita in the world right now, but I assume that’s by citizen – not government – hands. I was there in February, but on a bay island (ie not in Honduras) but even at San Pedro I didn’t get a creepy feel.
A gf of mine, the first Obamabot I knew, did a global environmental tour back in the 1990s, and she recalled a friend of her getting raped on a bus on New Delhi. I have no interest in India, going there etc, but the Indian part of this doesn’t surprise me
What also doesn’t surprise me is the obvious point counter to the skepticism of the Atlantic piece about Brazil not getting much of a mention: World Cup is there next year, dude – you think they’re going to scare off everyone by noting that it’s Rapetown with a side of Murder? Most people going to Brazil for the Cup already know they better stick to the main streets or the Sloth Cometh.
Durpers.
Posted by godsowncrunk 
