Facebook politics

December 20, 2012

Via HotAir:

On July 4, 2009, the day Sarah Palin announced that she would step down from the Governorship of Alaska, the perfect quip popped into my head. As we are wont to do in this age of social media, I immediately logged onto my Facebook account and typed the most famous line from Gerald Ford’s inauguration speech into the status update box: ‘Our long national nightmare is over.’

Minutes later, a distant acquaintance (the older brother of a high school friend with whom I had long ago fallen out of touch), posted a comment that I found surprising given what I knew (from earlier Facebook comment discussions) to be his radically left-wing political views. ‘Look, I completely disagree with most of Palin’s politics,’ he wrote in the way of political throat clearing. ‘But can we at least applaud the fact that unlike 90 per cent of Americans, she chose to keep Trig rather than killing him in the womb? She made the right decision, she struck a blow for the culture of life, and she deserves our praise for that regardless of what our politics may be.’

Another ‘friend’, a young woman who had been a senior while I was a freshman in college, and whom I barely even knew at the time and hadn’t spoken to in over five years, was having none of it. ‘Where is that completely bogus statistic from?’ she demanded to know from my other ‘friend’ whom she had never met. ‘Last time I checked, 90 per cent of Americans don’t support abortion and 90 per cent of women haven’t had them. Throwing out ridiculous numbers like that really doesn’t help your argument.’ What followed was an online argument lasting past 2am, in the course of which no less than the medical journal Prenatal Diagnosis was cited.

via ‘Vote for Romney and I’ll unfriend you’: why I won’t debate politics on Facebook » Spectator Blogs.

I don’t know who coined it, but I read it on my Twitter feed, and I’m quoted it often when explaining the difference between Twitter and Facebook: “Twitter’s made me fall in love with people I’ve never met, and Facebook made me hate people I’ve known my whole life.”

I ended my time on Facebook in 2010 (or was it 2011? I can’t even remember now) because I got tired of getting mad about what I was seeing. I thought I would have a detachment issue from the site, but after two or three days, I didn’t even think about it. Beyond occasionally getting on a girlfriend’s account and playing Fuck-Marry-Kill, or getting on my mom’s Facebook to see how intolerable almost everyone she’s Friends with is, I have no interaction with Facebook or the act of Facebooking.

I was at my parents’ home a couple weeks ago and (unwisely) updated their iPad iOS for them, and in the process got them the updated Facebook app. I barely recognized the site, but it was easy to scroll through a few days worth of Wall action. It was … disturbing. A good deal of the posts was religious in nature, but my mother is quite religious, as are many of her friends. Like politics, Facebook seems an odd place to constantly post religious-themed stuff beyond the occasional Bible verse,  but viral piety no doubt has its allure for those awash in the lamb’s blood.

Removed from Facebook and reading another person’s wall is an interesting experience. Although this is getting perilously close into turning into a bad Andy Rooney impersonation, I wonder if people who come across so horribly on Facebook realize that they come across that way. A frequent poster on mom’s feed is a distant relative who is my age, a failed artist who now spends their evenings critiquing the aspiring artists on the nation’s many nationally televised talent shows. He reeks of bitter and I wonder if anyone close to him has pointed out how terrible it makes him look? He was never a particularly likable fellow, and it’s always noteworthy when a person who has hundreds of Friends never gets so much as a Like on any of their diatribes against the horrible state of the Art.

I am thankful that I grew up in the last age where everything that popped into my teenage head couldn’t be shared with every person I knew. Although I used to be a newspaper columnist and, back when newspapers were a thing people read, I was also the kind of man who’d fire of angrily-worded letters to the editors. I cringe at perceived profundities I once uttered that now fall somewhere between ignorant and insane on the “profound” continuum, so the idea of unleashing the 17-year-old brex onto Facebook is, I dunno, Kafka-esque.

About these ads

Another reason to not, er, Facebook

September 26, 2012

First, this:

File this away in the “No Shit” folder: According to new research, Facebook stalking your ex “can delay emotional recovery and personal growth after a breakup.” Psychologist Tara C. Marshall of Brunel University in England asked 464 participants (mostly college-age women) to evaluate their Facebook usage and how well they were able to MOA after a breakup.

She asked them questions like, “How often do you look at your ex-partner’s Facebook page?” and “How often do you look at your ex-partner’s list of Facebook friends?” She also asked them to describe their feelings over the breakup and toward their ex. Participants were also asked whether they’d developed new romantic interests.

And get this! Marshall “discovered” that people who Facebook-stalk their exes have a more difficult time moving on already. They reported more emotional distress, negative feelings, and longing for their exes than people who avoided their exes on Facebook.

via Facebook Stalking Your Ex is Bad for Your Health — Dear Wendy.

Here’s some dirt, for your curiosity…

True story: in May of 2010, I broke up with my girlfriend. I’m not a man that gets into many serious relationships, but this one was good for awhile, then it fell off. We had a good time, I liked her, we clicked, then the thrill left. So that was that.

In the fall of 2010, unrelated to said break-up, I checked myself into a psych-hospital – again – thanks to the nagging Major Depression that is part of my lovely mental make-up. Again – whatever.

After a month-and-a-half of this business, I got out, traveled a bit to see friends and loved ones, and on Halloween I went to Xtina’s house to hand out candy, hang, normalize, etc. As was my way, I got on her computer (with her in the room, of course) and played “Fuck-Marry-Kill” with her Facebook friends.

That was when I saw it – the girl I’d broken up with that May was now married.

A few months later, I got off Facebook. It wasn’t the only reason, but it was part of it. I had no ill-will directed at my ex-gf beyond the reasons for breaking up with her, but fresh off getting out the hospital for, er, mental issue, it was a strange thing to see.

Related to what I clipped that’s posted above: no effing duh – seeing your ex, whether you liked, disliked, loved or hated them on Facebook isn’t a good thing.

During my tenure on Facebook, I was a compulsive delete’r. I wouldn’t Ignore, I would Delete. Within two days of our breakup, my ex posted various status updates regarding going back to church and getting close with God. For my Christian homies reading this, it’s true – if you date an atheist, you too will quit going to church. Not a judgement, just a fact.

As for the ex-gf, I wish her all the best.


Facebook funnies

July 11, 2012

Boom.


Regarding that Kony bidness…

March 10, 2012

Regarding that Kony business that is currently ruining your Facebook:

And this is whom Invisible Children wants the US government to train? Are they also proud that for the past two years, the Obama Administration has waived almost every penalty against foreign governments using child soldiers to give them more of our tax money in military aid?US military training often goes awry. Six years ago we trained Guatemalan soldiers to fight against the LRA. Kony’s group, according to David Axe at Wired, “wiped out the entire eight-man commando force and beheaded their commander.” We also trained Osama bin Laden to fight against the Soviet Union, which was then deemed the greater of two evils.

via Invisible Children – Takis Magazine.

Occasionally I’ll get emotionally sucked into causes, but the attempts to shed light on internecine power struggles and human rights violations of various African banana republics tend to produce as much ignorance as not. The average American attempting to understand who Kony is, why he is a particularly reprehensible human being, what child soldiers are, and the methods they use is pretty much impossible.

This is not a new story.

I’m not even an amateur Wiki-expert on Kony, but the child soldiers business has been going on for years – the battles over blood diamonds in Sierra Leone produced a heartbreaking generation of brainswashed, psychopathic children, and lest we forget the janjaweed and all those good times in Sudan.

George W. Bush probably had as close to a moral outlook regarding humanitarianism and foreign policy as a POTUS in this country can – he pumped gazillions of dollars into African, er, AIDS awareness, community-building and so forth, money that was – I’d add – completely wasted, if not well-intended.

What this sudden movement, spurred part and parcel by Invisible Children, wants is anyone’s guess. Intervention? What does that mean, exactly? Military? Multi-laterla? Unilateral? UNilateral? The only thing more dangerous than “well-intentioned” progressives pushing their ill-conceived domestic agendas on Americans is those progressives who look abroad for arcane, complex, Quixotic causes to embrace.

It’s a cruel world, and the existence of people like Kony are just a sliver of proof for that. I would wager that most Americans posting about Kony on Facebook, Twitter and elsewhere don’t know the first thing about the conditions that produced such a man, the collusion with local and national governments that has kept him alive all these years, or what – for that matter – it is that Invisible Children is actually trying accomplish.

/rant


Legal Insurrection opines about the mythical social media dance floor

February 26, 2012

William Jaconbson writes:

There is no social media dance floor.  It’s more like a bunch of isolated dance floors which have their own character and audience.

via » There is no social media dance floor – Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion.

Jacobson is commenting on a WaPo piece by Melissa Bell which “examines” the gender dynamics of various social networking sites like … every single one you think of when you hear the term “social networking.” Bell’s thesis, that women are taking over social networking, may or may not be true – what is true is that these vehicles, every last one of them, are designed by men in order to get users to share as much about themselves as humanly possible. As the saying goes, if the service is free and you are providing information to make the service more attractive, you are not a customer.

It used to be called target-marketing, and it works.

The only thing that could be described as a social networking tool I use is Twitter, and of my currently whopping 21 followers, I know exactly two of them. I follow a couple of people I know, but I mainly follow people whose work or art is of interest to me.

Again: “Twitter has taught me to love people I don’t know, and Facebook taught me to hate people I’ve known my entire life.” Trudat.

A girlfriend of mine who is quite successful in advertising spent an afternoon with me explaining to me some different ways I could use social networks to market Free Love for Saleand this was free advice that would’ve cost me a fortune if we weren’t friends. I took a little of her advice and didn’t follow the rest, not because it wasn’t good, but because I’m just not ambitious enough to dive into social networks on more than a lurk more/post less mentality – basically, z’GOC is where I post, and everywhere else I go I lurk, only occasionally commenting (the only place I’m even a moderately regular commenter is Big Hollywood, and I might comment three or four times a month there).

I hosted Xtina and Brella for dinner the other night, the former being one who is a number cruncher, the latter of whom works in media. They were talking about Pinterest, which I assumed had something to do with Lent/Easter/Catholicism, but it turns out its a social networking site dominated by women where they … talk … and post … and share … about … womynz … stuff … and things.

I was so curious about this I have yet to visit Pinterest, even though it’s referenced in the WaPo link above as well.

As a means of expression, I’ve always looked at social networks as a  sword that only cuts the user – beyond having an outlet to say or share, there’s really very little good that comes from the way most people use it. I’ve told Xtina on numerous occasions that I’m happy as a clam Facebook wasn’t around when I was in high school or college, because I said more regrettable things in a typical day than most people do in a month, and I used to be a throw-caution-to-the-wind kind of guy. I’ve been off Facebook since August, and it’s not something I miss.

Jacobson is correct that there’s not a theoretical dance floor in social media – there are many of them. Although I find little of value offered by most women bloggers and writers on a number of topics, my favorite blog is written by a woman. So long as women and men interact online in a social media atmosphere, women will be judged first by whatever kinds of pictures they share, and second how much they embody the stereotypes about women sharing on the Internet – lurk more is a concept few women I’ve seen understand, and even fewer would abide by if they understood what it means or why it’s a good rule to follow.

What I do know is that Facebook in particular reinforces a number of bad habits in Beta males, or foists those bad habits upon men who are otherwise, what, lower Alphas perhaps (I was certainly guilty of this when I was on Facebook, especially for the first year I used it). My standing rule about social networks – which are feminine by design in their ease-of-overshare – is that for men, if you’re not sharing pictures of your family or using it specifically to enhance your career/business or what have you, you’re not using it correctly.

However, I’m not exactly Johnny Consultant on how to use social networking effectively, so there’s that. That women dominate it or don’t dominate it is of little interest to me – other than being a diversion and a catalog of poor choices, dominating something so meaningless isn’t exactly something to crow about.

 


Mark Levin on FB

January 29, 2012

Read the whole thing:

Romney is not a conservative in the traditional sense, and he has a record of big-government Republicanism.  Even many years after the success of the Reagan administration, he sought to distance himself from Reagan and the GOP, self-identifying as a progressive and independent.  Thus, he resorts to spending multi-millions of dollars trashing his opponents, rather than providing thoughtful arguments on conservatism and constitutionalism.  Lest we forget, it was Gingrich who was trying to run a positive campaign and who offered to debate Romney one-on-one, asking Romney to stop with the millions in unanswered ads attacking him.  Romney declined.  I have no doubt that Romney would do the same thing to Santorum if Santorum was rising in the polls, albeit on different issues.

I have said that Romney is in many ways Richard Nixon, and that Romney would not successfully lead efforts to repeal Obamacare but, in fact, would grow the federal government in many respects.  Romney’s advisor, former senator Norm Coleman, has now said as much.  That is Romney’s record.  Despite having been a businessman, he was not a defender of free market capitalism while governor.  Romneycare is, as Santorum pointed out, a top-down government health care system with an individual mandate that is breaking Massachusetts’ treasury and destroying private health insurance.  It is a disaster.  Romney also backed cap-and-trade and TARP (as did Gingrich).

My great fear is, however, that he is the weakest candidate who can face Obama and will go into the general election with a fractured base, thanks to his own character flaws, which are now on display, and his tactics of personal destruction.  Moreover, while Romney can swamp his Republican opponents by 3 to 1 or more in every state with his spending advantage, Barack Obama will be raising more and spending more to beat him in the general election, meaning Romney’s financial advantage will be non-existent.

via CHARACTER MATTERS AND ROMNEY’S WORRIES ME | Facebook.


Why you can’t get laid – funny stuff

January 15, 2012

This was posted on ATWYS a couple days ago, and aside from being a damn good list, I noticed it also describes the most Beta of Beta attributes. I tend to believe there are very few natural Alphas in contemporary American society, that most men, due to have been put through the public school grinder, have had Betatude foisted upon them/us, and therefore host some level or trait of the Beta male, even if we actively or passively subvert/distort/smother it.

That being said, of all the good and bad things about Facebook, its worst aspect is the man who compliments attention whores and their attention-whoring pictures. To wit:

You Kiss The Asses of Attention Seeking Women – Holy Christ on a Trampoline. My vagina immediately dries up when I see the poor slobs who respond to every dating blogger’s me me me tweets or blog comments with a compliment or by awkwardly flirting. Stop it. They’re using you for attention. You will never touch their boobies. Doing this makes you look sad and desperate.

via Dear Men: Here’s Why You Can’t Get Laid.


A perfect storm? A perfect storm…

November 3, 2011

A perfect storm of ‘Kookery. I cringe to think of a few of my more, er, intoxicating comments from back in z’day – hopefully, those of us who got rid of our accounts won’t be swept up in the dragnet:

The Internet’s most popular — and powerful — search engine will soon expand its search index to include user comments on Facebook as part of Google’s traditional search results.

via Google To Index Facebook Comments As Search Results « CBS Los Angeles.


Three-and-a-half years later, my love/hate relationship with z’kook comes to an end

September 30, 2011

I’m not sure when I snapped, but I think it was the third, over-sized image imploring people to not be homophobic that finalized my decision to discontinue my presence on Facekook.

Read the rest of this entry »


Not wrong just evil: via Lifehacker, keeping your ‘Kook but leaving it at the site

September 26, 2011

I don’t normally have issues navigating and customizing the latest versions of Facekook, but the company’s latest overhaul is … different. I still haven’t gotten a handle on it, and judging by the Chinese Firedrill taking place among my Friends, they don’t either – most of them are still convinced that z’Kook is now charging for Gold Accounts et al, a clever joke that has flown around 4Chan for years. Anyway, Lifehacker has a handy guide on how to keep your ‘Kook activity there alone, while disabling the company’s prying eyes from everything else you do – if you go to the link below, you can block much of the site is doing without your knowledge:

Whether or not Facebook is tracking your browsing even when you’re logged out, if you don’t want third-party sites to send data to Facebook, you have some options. You could scrub your system clean of all Facebook.com cookies every time you use Facebook, but a number of developers have already stepped up with browser extensions to block Facebook services on third-party sites.

via Facebook Is Tracking Your Every Move on the Web; Here’s How to Stop It.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.