Regarding that Kony bidness…

March 10, 2012

Regarding that Kony business that is currently ruining your Facebook:

And this is whom Invisible Children wants the US government to train? Are they also proud that for the past two years, the Obama Administration has waived almost every penalty against foreign governments using child soldiers to give them more of our tax money in military aid?US military training often goes awry. Six years ago we trained Guatemalan soldiers to fight against the LRA. Kony’s group, according to David Axe at Wired, “wiped out the entire eight-man commando force and beheaded their commander.” We also trained Osama bin Laden to fight against the Soviet Union, which was then deemed the greater of two evils.

via Invisible Children – Takis Magazine.

Occasionally I’ll get emotionally sucked into causes, but the attempts to shed light on internecine power struggles and human rights violations of various African banana republics tend to produce as much ignorance as not. The average American attempting to understand who Kony is, why he is a particularly reprehensible human being, what child soldiers are, and the methods they use is pretty much impossible.

This is not a new story.

I’m not even an amateur Wiki-expert on Kony, but the child soldiers business has been going on for years – the battles over blood diamonds in Sierra Leone produced a heartbreaking generation of brainswashed, psychopathic children, and lest we forget the janjaweed and all those good times in Sudan.

George W. Bush probably had as close to a moral outlook regarding humanitarianism and foreign policy as a POTUS in this country can – he pumped gazillions of dollars into African, er, AIDS awareness, community-building and so forth, money that was – I’d add – completely wasted, if not well-intended.

What this sudden movement, spurred part and parcel by Invisible Children, wants is anyone’s guess. Intervention? What does that mean, exactly? Military? Multi-laterla? Unilateral? UNilateral? The only thing more dangerous than “well-intentioned” progressives pushing their ill-conceived domestic agendas on Americans is those progressives who look abroad for arcane, complex, Quixotic causes to embrace.

It’s a cruel world, and the existence of people like Kony are just a sliver of proof for that. I would wager that most Americans posting about Kony on Facebook, Twitter and elsewhere don’t know the first thing about the conditions that produced such a man, the collusion with local and national governments that has kept him alive all these years, or what – for that matter – it is that Invisible Children is actually trying accomplish.

/rant


Legal Insurrection opines about the mythical social media dance floor

February 26, 2012

William Jaconbson writes:

There is no social media dance floor.  It’s more like a bunch of isolated dance floors which have their own character and audience.

via » There is no social media dance floor – Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion.

Jacobson is commenting on a WaPo piece by Melissa Bell which “examines” the gender dynamics of various social networking sites like … every single one you think of when you hear the term “social networking.” Bell’s thesis, that women are taking over social networking, may or may not be true – what is true is that these vehicles, every last one of them, are designed by men in order to get users to share as much about themselves as humanly possible. As the saying goes, if the service is free and you are providing information to make the service more attractive, you are not a customer.

It used to be called target-marketing, and it works.

The only thing that could be described as a social networking tool I use is Twitter, and of my currently whopping 21 followers, I know exactly two of them. I follow a couple of people I know, but I mainly follow people whose work or art is of interest to me.

Again: “Twitter has taught me to love people I don’t know, and Facebook taught me to hate people I’ve known my entire life.” Trudat.

A girlfriend of mine who is quite successful in advertising spent an afternoon with me explaining to me some different ways I could use social networks to market Free Love for Saleand this was free advice that would’ve cost me a fortune if we weren’t friends. I took a little of her advice and didn’t follow the rest, not because it wasn’t good, but because I’m just not ambitious enough to dive into social networks on more than a lurk more/post less mentality – basically, z’GOC is where I post, and everywhere else I go I lurk, only occasionally commenting (the only place I’m even a moderately regular commenter is Big Hollywood, and I might comment three or four times a month there).

I hosted Xtina and Brella for dinner the other night, the former being one who is a number cruncher, the latter of whom works in media. They were talking about Pinterest, which I assumed had something to do with Lent/Easter/Catholicism, but it turns out its a social networking site dominated by women where they … talk … and post … and share … about … womynz … stuff … and things.

I was so curious about this I have yet to visit Pinterest, even though it’s referenced in the WaPo link above as well.

As a means of expression, I’ve always looked at social networks as a  sword that only cuts the user – beyond having an outlet to say or share, there’s really very little good that comes from the way most people use it. I’ve told Xtina on numerous occasions that I’m happy as a clam Facebook wasn’t around when I was in high school or college, because I said more regrettable things in a typical day than most people do in a month, and I used to be a throw-caution-to-the-wind kind of guy. I’ve been off Facebook since August, and it’s not something I miss.

Jacobson is correct that there’s not a theoretical dance floor in social media – there are many of them. Although I find little of value offered by most women bloggers and writers on a number of topics, my favorite blog is written by a woman. So long as women and men interact online in a social media atmosphere, women will be judged first by whatever kinds of pictures they share, and second how much they embody the stereotypes about women sharing on the Internet – lurk more is a concept few women I’ve seen understand, and even fewer would abide by if they understood what it means or why it’s a good rule to follow.

What I do know is that Facebook in particular reinforces a number of bad habits in Beta males, or foists those bad habits upon men who are otherwise, what, lower Alphas perhaps (I was certainly guilty of this when I was on Facebook, especially for the first year I used it). My standing rule about social networks – which are feminine by design in their ease-of-overshare – is that for men, if you’re not sharing pictures of your family or using it specifically to enhance your career/business or what have you, you’re not using it correctly.

However, I’m not exactly Johnny Consultant on how to use social networking effectively, so there’s that. That women dominate it or don’t dominate it is of little interest to me – other than being a diversion and a catalog of poor choices, dominating something so meaningless isn’t exactly something to crow about.

 


Mark Levin on FB

January 29, 2012

Read the whole thing:

Romney is not a conservative in the traditional sense, and he has a record of big-government Republicanism.  Even many years after the success of the Reagan administration, he sought to distance himself from Reagan and the GOP, self-identifying as a progressive and independent.  Thus, he resorts to spending multi-millions of dollars trashing his opponents, rather than providing thoughtful arguments on conservatism and constitutionalism.  Lest we forget, it was Gingrich who was trying to run a positive campaign and who offered to debate Romney one-on-one, asking Romney to stop with the millions in unanswered ads attacking him.  Romney declined.  I have no doubt that Romney would do the same thing to Santorum if Santorum was rising in the polls, albeit on different issues.

I have said that Romney is in many ways Richard Nixon, and that Romney would not successfully lead efforts to repeal Obamacare but, in fact, would grow the federal government in many respects.  Romney’s advisor, former senator Norm Coleman, has now said as much.  That is Romney’s record.  Despite having been a businessman, he was not a defender of free market capitalism while governor.  Romneycare is, as Santorum pointed out, a top-down government health care system with an individual mandate that is breaking Massachusetts’ treasury and destroying private health insurance.  It is a disaster.  Romney also backed cap-and-trade and TARP (as did Gingrich).

My great fear is, however, that he is the weakest candidate who can face Obama and will go into the general election with a fractured base, thanks to his own character flaws, which are now on display, and his tactics of personal destruction.  Moreover, while Romney can swamp his Republican opponents by 3 to 1 or more in every state with his spending advantage, Barack Obama will be raising more and spending more to beat him in the general election, meaning Romney’s financial advantage will be non-existent.

via CHARACTER MATTERS AND ROMNEY’S WORRIES ME | Facebook.


Why you can’t get laid – funny stuff

January 15, 2012

This was posted on ATWYS a couple days ago, and aside from being a damn good list, I noticed it also describes the most Beta of Beta attributes. I tend to believe there are very few natural Alphas in contemporary American society, that most men, due to have been put through the public school grinder, have had Betatude foisted upon them/us, and therefore host some level or trait of the Beta male, even if we actively or passively subvert/distort/smother it.

That being said, of all the good and bad things about Facebook, its worst aspect is the man who compliments attention whores and their attention-whoring pictures. To wit:

You Kiss The Asses of Attention Seeking Women – Holy Christ on a Trampoline. My vagina immediately dries up when I see the poor slobs who respond to every dating blogger’s me me me tweets or blog comments with a compliment or by awkwardly flirting. Stop it. They’re using you for attention. You will never touch their boobies. Doing this makes you look sad and desperate.

via Dear Men: Here’s Why You Can’t Get Laid.


A perfect storm? A perfect storm…

November 3, 2011

A perfect storm of ‘Kookery. I cringe to think of a few of my more, er, intoxicating comments from back in z’day – hopefully, those of us who got rid of our accounts won’t be swept up in the dragnet:

The Internet’s most popular — and powerful — search engine will soon expand its search index to include user comments on Facebook as part of Google’s traditional search results.

via Google To Index Facebook Comments As Search Results « CBS Los Angeles.


Three-and-a-half years later, my love/hate relationship with z’kook comes to an end

September 30, 2011

I’m not sure when I snapped, but I think it was the third, over-sized image imploring people to not be homophobic that finalized my decision to discontinue my presence on Facekook.

Read the rest of this entry »


Not wrong just evil: via Lifehacker, keeping your ‘Kook but leaving it at the site

September 26, 2011

I don’t normally have issues navigating and customizing the latest versions of Facekook, but the company’s latest overhaul is … different. I still haven’t gotten a handle on it, and judging by the Chinese Firedrill taking place among my Friends, they don’t either – most of them are still convinced that z’Kook is now charging for Gold Accounts et al, a clever joke that has flown around 4Chan for years. Anyway, Lifehacker has a handy guide on how to keep your ‘Kook activity there alone, while disabling the company’s prying eyes from everything else you do – if you go to the link below, you can block much of the site is doing without your knowledge:

Whether or not Facebook is tracking your browsing even when you’re logged out, if you don’t want third-party sites to send data to Facebook, you have some options. You could scrub your system clean of all Facebook.com cookies every time you use Facebook, but a number of developers have already stepped up with browser extensions to block Facebook services on third-party sites.

via Facebook Is Tracking Your Every Move on the Web; Here’s How to Stop It.


The New Facebook Lists Are “Too Painful to Use”

September 22, 2011

Sean Parker, on the new Facekook redesign. What I find instructive about this rant is that, unless you’re really, really, really into site design, most of it makes about as much sense as the ingredients listed on the side of a bottle of soda pop:

What I do think will become clear with time is that while Facebook was doing a piss poor job of making these decisions on our behalf, most users never paid it much heed until they were given a taste of the alternative in the form of a simple toolset to do the job for themselves.

[J]ust to be absolutely clear, lest anyone misinterpret my ranting, I’m incredibly happy with where the product is headed and this is a proud moment to be an owner and friend of the company. Regardless of whether you’re exhilarated or aggravated by the recent changes, there’s a lot more good things coming down the pipe.

via The New Facebook Lists Are “Too Painful to Use”.


Inforama: A very strange inforgraf re z’Kook

August 18, 2011


Regarding Google+ v. Facekook

July 13, 2011

I finally managed to get a Google+ invite, and proceeded to invite a half-dozen people or so. Although how Google+ will fare is not of interest to me, I happily admit it is, er, liberating to slowly transition away from z’Kook.

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers